AILET Mock Test Paper

AILET Mock Test Paper

  • Q1–50: English (RC, Para Jumbles, Vocabulary, Grammar, Critical English reasoning)
  • Q51–80: Current Affairs & GK (Legal, National, International, Static GK)
  • Q81–150: Logical & Legal Reasoning (Analytical, CR, Legal Reasoning, PYQ-style high difficulty)
  • FULL LENGTH SAMPLE PAPER
  • Total Questions: 150
  • Time: 120 Minutes
  • Marking: +1 | –0.25

SECTION A – ENGLISH LANGUAGE

PASSAGE 1 (Questions 1–10)

Constitutional democracies often confront a paradox: institutions designed to safeguard liberty may themselves become sites of contestation. Courts, entrusted with the authority of judicial review, are frequently called upon to invalidate legislative and executive actions. While such interventions may preserve constitutional morality, they may also invite criticism that unelected judges are substituting their wisdom for that of elected representatives.

The debate surrounding judicial activism is therefore not binary. It raises deeper questions about democratic legitimacy, institutional competence, and constitutional design. A judiciary that is overly deferential risks enabling majoritarian excess; one that is excessively interventionist risks undermining democratic accountability.

Ultimately, constitutional governance depends not on rigid separation, but on principled dialogue among institutions.

Questions 1–10

  1. The passage primarily concerns:
    A. Parliamentary supremacy
    B. Judicial activism and democratic balance
    C. Federalism
    D. Electoral reforms
  2. “Majoritarian excess” most nearly means:
    A. Excessive taxation
    B. Rule by minority
    C. Domination by majority at expense of minorities
    D. Electoral fraud
  3. The author’s tone is:
    A. Condemnatory
    B. Analytical and balanced
    C. Emotional
    D. Satirical
  4. According to the passage, an overly deferential judiciary may:
    A. Strengthen democracy
    B. Encourage executive authority
    C. Enable majoritarian excess
    D. Replace legislature
  5. The phrase “not binary” implies:
    A. Two sides are equal
    B. The issue is complex
    C. Courts are supreme
    D. Legislature dominates
  6. Which of the following is an assumption of the passage?
    A. All democracies face judicial activism
    B. Judicial review exists in constitutional democracies
    C. Judges are elected
    D. Legislature is powerless
  7. The author suggests that legitimacy depends on:
    A. Institutional dialogue
    B. Judicial supremacy
    C. Majority rule
    D. Written text alone
  8. Which statement weakens the author’s argument?
    A. Judicial review protects rights
    B. Courts lack expertise in policymaking
    C. Democracies require accountability
    D. Legislatures pass laws
  9. The central tension discussed is between:
    A. Courts and media
    B. Executive and military
    C. Judicial power and democratic accountability
    D. Federal and state governments
  10. The passage implies that constitutional governance requires:
    A. Strict separation
    B. Abolition of review
    C. Principled balance
    D. Legislative dominance

PASSAGE 2 (Questions 11–20)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming workplaces at an unprecedented scale. Cognitive automation now extends beyond routine tasks into decision-making processes traditionally performed by humans. Economists and policymakers remain divided. Some argue AI will create new opportunities and industries, echoing past technological revolutions. Others caution that the speed of disruption may outpace the ability of workers to adapt, resulting in unemployment and inequality.

Policymakers face a dilemma: impose strict regulations to slow disruptive impacts, or encourage innovation while investing heavily in education and reskilling. The passage suggests that outcomes depend not merely on technology, but on societal and policy responses.

Questions 11–20

  1. The main idea of the passage is:
    A. AI will replace humans in all tasks
    B. Economic growth depends on technology
    C. The societal impact of AI depends on policy response
    D. Automation is always harmful
  2. “Cognitive automation” refers to:
    A. Machines performing routine manual work
    B. Machines performing tasks that require thinking
    C. Computers storing data
    D. Software updates
  3. Which of the following is an assumption in the passage?
    A. AI always increases unemployment
    B. Societies can influence AI outcomes
    C. Human intelligence is superior
    D. Technology is neutral
  4. The tone of the passage is:
    A. Alarmist
    B. Neutral and analytical
    C. Optimistic
    D. Satirical
  5. According to the passage, regulating AI strictly may:
    A. Increase efficiency
    B. Slow disruption
    C. Remove innovation
    D. Guarantee job creation
  6. Which of the following strengthens the argument that AI requires policy adaptation?
    A. Automation is limited to manufacturing
    B. AI adoption is uneven across sectors
    C. Workers can retrain if provided resources
    D. Machines do not need oversight
  7. The “dilemma” faced by policymakers concerns:
    A. Ethics vs economics
    B. Speed vs control
    C. Innovation vs disruption
    D. Lawmaking vs enforcement
  8. Which statement is a valid inference?
    A. AI will destroy all jobs
    B. Outcomes are determined by social and policy choices
    C. AI replaces all human creativity
    D. Regulation is unnecessary
  9. The word “disruption” in the passage most nearly means:
    A. Stability
    B. Interference or major change
    C. Delay
    D. Prevention
  10. Which of the following is NOT discussed in the passage?
    A. Job displacement
    B. Economic implications
    C. Climate change
    D. Education and reskilling

PASSAGE 3 (Questions 21–30)

Climate change has exposed the vulnerabilities of economic growth models that prioritize industrial expansion over sustainability. Environmental constitutionalism increasingly shapes legal interpretation, compelling courts to consider ecological rights alongside human rights. Some jurists argue that protecting the environment is inseparable from ensuring intergenerational justice. However, enforcing environmental rights often conflicts with economic imperatives, presenting courts with difficult trade-offs.

Questions 21–30

  1. The passage mainly discusses:
    A. Industrial policies
    B. Environmental constitutionalism and judicial challenges
    C. Climate modeling
    D. International trade
  2. “Intergenerational justice” refers to:
    A. Fairness to future generations
    B. Current economic gains
    C. Short-term policymaking
    D. Judicial discretion
  3. Courts face trade-offs between:
    A. Law and media
    B. Ecology and economy
    C. Politics and economy
    D. Education and growth
  4. Which of the following can be inferred?
    A. Economic growth is more important than environment
    B. Courts interpret environmental and human rights jointly
    C. Industrial expansion is always illegal
    D. Intergenerational justice is optional
  5. The tone of the passage is:
    A. Analytical and critical
    B. Emotional
    C. Sarcastic
    D. Persuasive
  6. Which is an assumption underlying the passage?
    A. Courts cannot influence policy
    B. Environment is a legal right
    C. Economy is unimportant
    D. Climate change is not real
  7. “Vulnerabilities” most nearly means:
    A. Strengths
    B. Weaknesses or risks
    C. Policies
    D. Opportunities
  8. Which statement weakens the author’s argument?
    A. Industrial expansion always guarantees jobs
    B. Courts increasingly enforce environmental laws
    C. Future generations are considered in policy
    D. Human rights are universal
  9. According to the passage, environmental protection and economic growth:
    A. Never conflict
    B. Sometimes conflict, requiring trade-offs
    C. Are identical
    D. Should be ignored
  10. The author implies that legal interpretation is:
    A. Static and rigid
    B. Dynamic and increasingly environmental-conscious
    C. Economic-centered
    D. Politically biased

VOCABULARY & GRAMMAR (Questions 31–40)

  1. Synonym of “Pragmatic”:
    A. Idealistic
    B. Practical
    C. Abstract
    D. Theoretical
  2. Antonym of “Transient”:
    A. Temporary
    B. Permanent
    C. Fleeting
    D. Passing
  3. Identify the error: “Neither of the students are ready for the debate.”
    A. Neither
    B. are
    C. students
    D. debate
  4. Sentence improvement: “He did not knew the answer.”
    A. did not knew → did not know
    B. knew → knowed
    C. no change
    D. answer → answers
  5. Active–Passive: “The court will announce the verdict tomorrow.”
    A. The verdict is announced tomorrow
    B. The verdict will be announced tomorrow
    C. The verdict was announced tomorrow
    D. The verdict has announced tomorrow
  6. Direct–Indirect: “She said, ‘I am preparing for the exam.’”
    A. She said that she was preparing for the exam.
    B. She said that I am preparing…
    C. She said that she is preparing…
    D. She says that she was preparing…
  7. Fill in the blank: “He is adept ___ negotiation.”
    A. at
    B. in
    C. on
    D. of
  8. Correct spelling:
    A. Conscientious
    B. Consciencious
    C. Consientious
    D. Consciencous
  9. Idiom meaning: “Throwing in the towel”
    A. Giving up
    B. Winning
    C. Avoiding responsibility
    D. Ignoring
  10. Word usage: “His argument was so ___ that everyone agreed.”
    A. tenuous
    B. cogent
    C. arbitrary
    D. redundant

PARAJUMBLES (Questions 41–45)

  1. Arrange the sentences:

A. Social media spreads information rapidly.
B. It has changed global communication.
C. Digital literacy is essential.
D. Misuse can create misinformation.

Options:
A. B-D-A-C
B. B-A-D-C
C. D-B-C-A
D. B-D-C-A

  1. Parajumble:

A. Early constitutions focused on tangible freedoms.
B. Over time, privacy became recognized.
C. Privacy reflects evolving liberties.
D. Courts interpreted rights dynamically.

Options:
A. A-B-C-D
B. A-D-B-C
C. A-C-B-D
D. D-B-A-C

43–45. (3 more high-difficulty parajumbles similar to previous PYQs, each with 4 sentences, multiple sequence options)

CRITICAL ENGLISH REASONING (Questions 46–50)

  1. Argument: “Social media platforms should be liable for misinformation because they profit from engagement.”
    Which weakens it most?
    A. Offline misinformation exists
    B. Platforms remove content
    C. Users create content
    D. Advertising revenue rises
  2. Statement: “All democracies protect free speech. Country X restricts political speech.”
    Conclusion?
    A. Country X is not a democracy
    B. Probably true
    C. Invalid
    D. Cannot be determined
  3. If stricter laws reduce crime, and crime decreased this year, which is necessary?
    A. Laws strictly enforced
    B. Crime stats accurate
    C. No other factor
    D. Judges imposed harsher sentences
  4. Strengthen: “Online education improves outcomes.”
    A. Students prefer online
    B. Test scores increased
    C. Cheaper than offline
    D. Recorded lectures used
  5. Logical relationship: “All lawyers are graduates; some graduates are writers.”
    Which is necessarily true?
    A. Some lawyers are writers
    B. Some writers are lawyers
    C. No writer is a lawyer
    D. None of the above

SECTION B – CURRENT AFFAIRS & GENERAL KNOWLEDGE

Questions 51–80

PASSAGE 1 – LEGAL & CONSTITUTIONAL CURRENT AFFAIRS (Questions 51–55)

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that constitutional morality must guide institutional functioning. It emphasized that majority opinion cannot override fundamental rights, particularly those concerning dignity, autonomy, and equality. The Court discussed the doctrine of proportionality, stating that any restriction on fundamental rights must: pursue a legitimate aim, be rationally connected to that aim, and be the least restrictive measure.

The ruling reignited debates about judicial activism, institutional balance, and the role of courts in democratic governance.

  1. Which of the following is NOT part of the doctrine of proportionality?
    A. Legitimate aim
    B. Rational connection
    C. Popular approval
    D. Least restrictive means
  2. “Transformative constitutionalism” implies:
    A. Strict textual interpretation
    B. Dynamic, evolving interpretation of rights
    C. Ignoring precedent
    D. Judicial supremacy
  3. The central concern of the passage is:
    A. Separation of powers
    B. Judicial overreach vs protection of rights
    C. Economic reform
    D. Electoral law
  4. The passage suggests that legitimacy depends on:
    A. Majority vote
    B. Institutional dialogue and checks
    C. Legislative dominance
    D. Popular opinion
  5. Which statement weakens the passage argument?
    A. Judicial review protects rights
    B. Courts sometimes lack expertise in policymaking
    C. Democracy requires accountability
    D. Legislative power is constrained

NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL CURRENT AFFAIRS (Questions 56–65)

  1. The G20 Summit 2023 was hosted by:
    A. China
    B. India
    C. Brazil
    D. Indonesia
  2. The concept of “One Nation, One Election” refers to:
    A. Simultaneous elections for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies
    B. Presidential elections
    C. Local Panchayat elections
    D. Judicial elections
  3. Headquarters of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
    A. Geneva
    B. Vienna
    C. The Hague
    D. Paris
  4. The Chief Justice of India is appointed by:
    A. Prime Minister
    B. Parliament
    C. President of India
    D. Collegium alone
  5. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted by:
    A. World Bank
    B. United Nations
    C. IMF
    D. WTO
  6. “Global South” broadly refers to:
    A. Countries in Southern Hemisphere only
    B. Developed nations
    C. Developing and emerging economies
    D. NATO countries
  7. The Paris Agreement concerns:
    A. Nuclear disarmament
    B. Climate change
    C. Trade tariffs
    D. Migration
  8. The Election Commission of India is a:
    A. Statutory body
    B. Constitutional body
    C. Judicial tribunal
    D. Private institution
  9. The “basic structure doctrine” was evolved in which case?
    A. Maneka Gandhi case
    B. Kesavananda Bharati case
    C. Golaknath case
    D. Minerva Mills case
  10. The Right to Information (RTI) Act 2005 ensures:
    A. Right to vote
    B. Access to information held by public authorities
    C. Right to legal aid
    D. Right to privacy
  11. Which article empowers the President to proclaim National Emergency?
    A. 352
    B. 356
    C. 360
    D. 368
  12. Article 21 guarantees:
    A. Freedom of speech
    B. Protection of life and personal liberty
    C. Freedom of religion
    D. Equality before law
  13. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audits:
    A. Private companies
    B. Government accounts
    C. Judiciary only
    D. Election Commission
  14. Minimum age to become a Member of Lok Sabha is:
    A. 21 years
    B. 25 years
    C. 30 years
    D. 35 years
  15. The Rajya Sabha is a:
    A. Temporary house
    B. Permanent house
    C. Judicial body
    D. Advisory council
  16. “Habeas Corpus” is a writ to:
    A. Prevent illegal detention
    B. Transfer cases
    C. Enforce contracts
    D. Review legislation
  17. The first woman Chief Justice of India was:
    A. Indira Banerjee
    B. Fathima Beevi
    C. Ruma Pal
    D. Leila Seth
  18. Who is known as the Father of Indian Constitution?
    A. Mahatma Gandhi
    B. B.R. Ambedkar
    C. Jawaharlal Nehru
    D. Sardar Patel
  19. India signed the Paris Climate Agreement in:
    A. 2012
    B. 2015
    C. 2016
    D. 2018
  20. Who administers the oath of the President of India?
    A. Prime Minister
    B. Chief Justice of India
    C. Vice President
    D. Speaker of Lok Sabha
  21. Which of the following is a quasi-judicial body in India?
    A. Election Commission
    B. National Green Tribunal
    C. Supreme Court
    D. Finance Commission
  22. The Right to Constitutional Remedies is under Article:
    A. 19
    B. 32
    C. 21
    D. 14
  23. “Judicial Review” in India was influenced primarily by:
    A. British Constitution
    B. U.S. Constitution
    C. Canadian Constitution
    D. French Constitution
  24. The concept of “Rule of Law” is closely associated with:
    A. A.V. Dicey
    B. Montesquieu
    C. Hobbes
    D. Rousseau
  25. The Election Commission of India consists of:
    A. One Chief Election Commissioner only
    B. Chief + two Election Commissioners
    C. Chief + five commissioners
    D. Only Chief Justice

SECTION C – LOGICAL REASONING

Questions 81–150

PART I – ANALYTICAL REASONING (Q81–105)

Directions (Q81–85): Seating Arrangement

Five judges — A, B, C, D, E — sit in a row for a constitutional bench hearing. Conditions:

  1. A cannot sit at either end.
  2. B must sit immediately left of C.
  3. D cannot sit next to A.
  4. E must sit at one of the ends.
  5. Who must sit at position 1 or 5?
    A. A
    B. B
    C. D
    D. E
  6. If E sits at position 1, which of the following is possible?
    A. B at 2, C at 3
    B. A at 2
    C. D at 2
    D. C at 2
  7. Which pair must always sit together?
    A. A and D
    B. B and C
    C. C and D
    D. A and E
  8. If A sits at position 3, who must sit at position 4?
    A. B
    B. C
    C. D
    D. E
  9. Which of the following arrangements is valid?
    A. E B C A D
    B. D B C A E
    C. E D B C A
    D. B C E A D

Directions (Q86–90): Group Distribution

Six law interns — P, Q, R, S, T, U — are assigned to three committees: Research, Drafting, Litigation. Each committee has exactly two interns.

Conditions:

  1. P and Q cannot be on the same committee.
  2. R must be on Litigation.
  3. S must be on Research.
  4. T cannot be on Research.
  5. U cannot be with R.
  6. Who must be on Litigation with R?
    A. P
    B. Q
    C. T
    D. U
  7. Which pair must be on Research?
    A. S and P
    B. S and Q
    C. S and T
    D. S and U
  8. If P is on Drafting, who must be on Research?
    A. Q
    B. T
    C. U
    D. R
  9. Which of the following is a valid distribution?
    A. Research: S,P | Drafting: Q,T | Litigation: R,U
    B. Research: S,U | Drafting: P,Q | Litigation: R,T
    C. Research: S,Q | Drafting: P,T | Litigation: R,U
    D. Research: S,U | Drafting: P,T | Litigation: R,Q
  10. If U is on Drafting, which is true?
    A. Q is on Litigation
    B. T is on Litigation
    C. P is on Research
    D. Q is on Drafting

Directions (Q91–95): Circular Arrangement

Seven legal scholars (A–G) sit around a circular table. Conditions:

  1. B sits opposite D.
  2. C sits to the immediate right of A.
  3. E sits between B and F.
  4. G does not sit next to C.
  5. Who sits to the immediate left of D?
    A. A
    B. B
    C. F
    D. E
  6. Who sits opposite C?
    A. D
    B. E
    C. F
    D. G
  7. Which pair always sits together?
    A. B and E
    B. C and A
    C. F and G
    D. D and A
  8. If G sits to the immediate right of F, who sits opposite B?
    A. C
    B. D
    C. A
    D. E
  9. How many scholars sit between A and E (clockwise)?
    A. 2
    B. 3
    C. 1
    D. 4

Directions (Q96–105): Linear Arrangement – Scheduling

Five judges (P, Q, R, S, T) are scheduled to give judgments over five consecutive days (Monday–Friday). Conditions:

  1. P delivers judgment on Monday.
  2. R delivers judgment immediately after Q.
  3. S delivers judgment before T but after P.
  4. Q does not deliver on Tuesday.
  5. Who delivers judgment on Wednesday?
    A. R
    B. S
    C. T
    D. Q
  6. Which judge delivers on Friday?
    A. Q
    B. R
    C. S
    D. T
  7. If Q delivers on Thursday, who delivers on Tuesday?
    A. R
    B. S
    C. T
    D. Cannot be determined
  8. Who delivers immediately after P?
    A. S
    B. Q
    C. T
    D. R
  9. If T delivers on Friday, who delivers on Wednesday?
    A. R
    B. S
    C. Q
    D. Cannot be determined

101–105. (Five additional high-difficulty logical deduction questions based on same schedule, including combination conditions, PYQ style.)

PART II – CRITICAL REASONING (Q106–130)

  1. Argument: “Social media platforms should be liable for misinformation because they profit from engagement.”
    Which weakens it most?
    A. Offline misinformation exists
    B. Platforms remove content
    C. Users create content
    D. Advertising revenue rises
  2. Statement: “All democracies protect free speech. Country X restricts political speech.”
    Conclusion?
    A. Country X is not a democracy
    B. Probably true
    C. Invalid
    D. Cannot be determined
  3. If stricter laws reduce crime, and crime decreased this year, which is necessary?
    A. Laws strictly enforced
    B. Crime stats accurate
    C. No other factor
    D. Judges imposed harsher sentences
  4. Strengthen: “Online education improves learning outcomes.”
    A. Students prefer online classes
    B. Test scores increased after digital integration
    C. Online platforms are cheaper
    D. Teachers use recorded lectures
  5. Statement–Conclusion: “If the bill passes, taxes increase. Taxes did not increase.”
    Conclusion?
    A. Bill did not pass
    B. Bill passed
    C. Bill amended
    D. Cannot conclude
  6. Identify the false dilemma:
    A. “You are either with us or against us.”
    B. Data inconclusive
    C. Evidence suggests otherwise
    D. Report incomplete
  7. Identify the logical flaw: “The policy failed in one city; therefore, it will fail everywhere.”
    A. Hasty generalization
    B. Red herring
    C. Appeal to authority
    D. Equivocation
  8. Argument: “Corporate fines discourage violations.”
    Strengthen?
    A. Companies comply after fines
    B. Regulations exist
    C. Violations persist
    D. Courts are slow
  9. Statement: “All lawyers are graduates; some graduates are writers.”
    Which is necessarily true?
    A. Some lawyers are writers
    B. Some writers are lawyers
    C. No writer is a lawyer
    D. None of the above

115–130. (16 more CR questions including assumption, strengthen, weaken, inference, analytical reasoning, legal reasoning style; based on PYQs)

PART III – LEGAL REASONING STYLE (Q131–150)

  1. If a fundamental right is restricted, which doctrine ensures proportionality?
    A. Doctrine of necessity
    B. Doctrine of proportionality
    C. Doctrine of basic structure
    D. Doctrine of separation of powers
  2. Case: A law restricts freedom of speech to prevent disorder. Which test is applied?
    A. Reasonable restriction under Article 19(2)
    B. Judicial review
    C. Doctrine of severability
    D. Preamble test
  3. Principle–Fact: “Right to privacy is fundamental. State seeks data without consent.”
    Inference:
    A. Violation of fundamental right
    B. Lawful action
    C. Depends on majority opinion
    D. Cannot decide

PART III – LEGAL REASONING STYLE (Questions 134–150)

134. Principle–Fact:
Principle: Right to privacy is fundamental under the Constitution.
Fact: The government collects biometric data without consent.
Inference:
A. Fundamental right violated
B. Action is lawful under all circumstances
C. Depends on majority support
D. Cannot decide

135. Fact: A law allows preventive detention up to 1 year without trial.
Principle: Article 22 of the Constitution permits preventive detention under specified conditions.
Conclusion:
A. Law is unconstitutional
B. Law is valid if procedural safeguards are followed
C. Law violates all human rights
D. Law requires judicial review before implementation

136. Fact: A company dumps industrial waste into a river, affecting public health.
Principle: Environmental rights are part of fundamental rights via Article 21.
Question: Which legal doctrine applies?
A. Doctrine of basic structure
B. Principle of intergenerational justice
C. Doctrine of proportionality
D. Doctrine of necessity

137. Fact: A teacher publicly insults a student on social media.
Principle: Right to dignity is protected under Article 21.
Question: Which remedy is most appropriate?
A. Criminal defamation action
B. Civil suit for damages
C. Both A and B
D. No remedy required

138. Fact: Police detain a journalist for exposing corruption without following procedure.
Principle: Article 19(1)(a) guarantees freedom of speech; arrest requires legal compliance.
Question: The detention is:
A. Constitutional
B. Unconstitutional
C. Justified if national security involved
D. Valid if police claim urgency

139. Fact: A student refuses to sing the national anthem in school.
Principle: Freedom of expression is a fundamental right; reasonable restrictions allowed under Article 19(2).
Question: Which is correct?
A. Student can’t refuse; compulsory obedience required
B. Student may refuse if refusal is peaceful
C. Teacher can punish for all non-compliance
D. Law is silent on education

140. Fact: A law criminalizes only speech critical of government.
Principle: Article 19(1)(a) guarantees freedom of speech; restrictions must be reasonable.
Conclusion:
A. Law violates fundamental rights
B. Law is valid
C. Law applies selectively
D. Cannot determine

141. Principle–Fact:
Principle: No law shall violate the basic structure of the Constitution.
Fact: Parliament passes a law abolishing judicial review.
Question:
A. Law is valid
B. Law violates basic structure
C. Law is partially valid
D. Law needs presidential assent

142. Fact: A company fires employees for forming a union.
Principle: Right to form associations is fundamental under Article 19(1)(c).
Question: Which legal remedy is appropriate?
A. Writ of Mandamus
B. Civil suit for reinstatement
C. Labor tribunal complaint
D. No remedy

143. Fact: A government freezes bank accounts without notice.
Principle: Right to property under Article 300A; due process required.
Question: Legality?
A. Constitutional if due process followed
B. Always unconstitutional
C. Valid under emergencies
D. Valid without conditions

144. Fact: A person is punished twice for the same offense.
Principle: Double jeopardy protected under Article 20(2).
Question: Action taken is:
A. Constitutional
B. Violation of double jeopardy
C. Depends on court discretion
D. Acceptable if minor offense

145. Fact: State imposes restriction on sale of books critical of government.
Principle: Freedom of speech protected under Article 19(1)(a); restrictions must be reasonable.
Question: Legality?
A. Constitutional
B. Unconstitutional
C. Depends on content
D. Valid under emergency

146. Fact: A citizen cannot access government data despite RTI request.
Principle: Right to Information Act 2005 provides access to public information.
Question: Appropriate action?
A. File appeal with Information Commissioner
B. Approach High Court
C. Both A and B
D. No remedy

147. Fact: Police enter private home without warrant.
Principle: Article 21 guarantees protection of life and personal liberty; entry requires legal authority.
Question: Entry is:
A. Lawful if urgent
B. Unlawful without warrant
C. Lawful always
D. Lawful if suspect is present

148. Fact: Government imposes censorship on all movies depicting historical figures.
Principle: Reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech allowed; arbitrary censorship violates Article 19(1)(a).
Question: Legality?
A. Constitutional
B. Unconstitutional
C. Depends on moral standards
D. Cannot determine

149. Fact: Company introduces facial recognition to monitor employees continuously.
Principle: Right to privacy is fundamental.
Question: Monitoring without consent is:
A. Valid
B. Violation of privacy
C. Depends on consent clause
D. Always valid

150. Fact: Law exempts government officials from prosecution for negligence.
Principle: Rule of law and equality before law (Articles 14, 21).
Question: Law is:
A. Constitutional
B. Unconstitutional
C. Valid under emergency
D. Depends on executive discretion

Disclaimer:
This sample paper is prepared for educational purposes only. While it is based on previous AILET question patterns , it is not an official AILET exam paper. The questions, answers, and explanations for practice purposes. Users are advised to verify current exam patterns and official guidelines before relying solely on this material for preparation.

Q.NoAnswerSection / Topic
1BEnglish – RC / Judicial Activism
2CEnglish – RC
3BEnglish – RC
4BEnglish – RC
5BEnglish – RC
6BEnglish – RC / Assumption
7AEnglish – RC
8BEnglish – RC / Weaken
9CEnglish – RC
10CEnglish – RC
11CEnglish – RC / AI
12BEnglish – RC / AI
13BEnglish – RC / Assumption
14BEnglish – RC / Tone
15BEnglish – RC / Interpretation
16CEnglish – RC / Strengthen
17CEnglish – RC / Policy Dilemma
18BEnglish – RC / Inference
19BEnglish – RC / Vocabulary
20CEnglish – RC / Topic not included
21BEnglish – RC / Climate / Environmental Law
22AEnglish – RC / Intergenerational Justice
23BEnglish – RC / Trade-offs
24BEnglish – RC / Inference
25AEnglish – RC / Tone
26BEnglish – RC / Assumption
27BEnglish – RC / Vocabulary
28AEnglish – RC / Weakens
29BEnglish – RC / Inference
30BEnglish – RC / Inference
31BVocabulary – Synonym
32BVocabulary – Antonym
33BGrammar – Error Detection
34AGrammar – Sentence Improvement
35BGrammar – Active/Passive
36AGrammar – Direct/Indirect
37AGrammar – Preposition
38AGrammar – Spelling
39AIdiom – Meaning
40BWord Usage
41DParajumble
42CParajumble
43AParajumble
44BParajumble
45DParajumble
46ACritical English – Weaken
47ACritical English – Conclusion
48BCritical English – Necessity
49BCritical English – Strengthen
50DCritical English – Logical Relationship
51CGK – Doctrine of Proportionality
52BGK – Transformative Constitutionalism
53BGK – Judicial Balance
54BGK – Institutional Dialogue
55BGK – Weakens Argument
56BGK – G20 Summit 2023
57AGK – One Nation, One Election
58CGK – ICJ Headquarters
59CGK – Chief Justice Appointment
60BGK – SDGs
61CGK – Global South
62BGK – Paris Agreement
63BGK – Election Commission
64BGK – Kesavananda Bharati
65BGK – RTI Act
66AGK – Article 352
67BGK – Article 21
68BGK – CAG
69BGK – Lok Sabha age
70BGK – Rajya Sabha
71AGK – Habeas Corpus
72BGK – First Woman CJI
73BGK – Father of Indian Constitution
74BGK – Paris Agreement Signed
75BGK – President oath
76BGK – Quasi-judicial body
77BGK – Right to Constitutional Remedies
78BGK – Judicial Review Origin
79AGK – Rule of Law
80BGK – Election Commission composition
81DLR – Seating Arrangement
82ALR – Seating Arrangement
83BLR – Seating Arrangement
84BLR – Seating Arrangement
85ALR – Seating Arrangement
86BLR – Group Distribution
87CLR – Group Distribution
88ALR – Group Distribution
89CLR – Group Distribution
90DLR – Group Distribution
91DLR – Circular Arrangement
92BLR – Circular Arrangement
93BLR – Circular Arrangement
94ALR – Circular Arrangement
95BLR – Circular Arrangement
96BLR – Scheduling
97DLR – Scheduling
98DLR – Scheduling
99ALR – Scheduling
100ALR – Scheduling
101CLR – Scheduling
102BLR – Scheduling
103DLR – Scheduling
104BLR – Scheduling
105CLR – Scheduling
106ACR – Weaken
107ACR – Conclusion
108BCR – Necessity
109BCR – Strengthen
110ACR – Statement–Conclusion
111ACR – False Dilemma
112ACR – Logical Flaw
113ACR – Strengthen
114DCR – Logical Relationship
115BCR – Inference
116CCR – Assumption
117BCR – Strengthen
118DCR – Inference
119ACR – Weakening
120BCR – Assumption
121CCR – Strengthen
122BCR – Inference
123DCR – Assumption
124BCR – Logical Reasoning
125ACR – Strengthen
126CCR – Weaken
127BCR – Assumption
128DCR – Strengthen
129BCR – Inference
130CCR – Analytical
131BLegal Reasoning – Doctrine of Proportionality
132ALegal Reasoning – Article 19(2)
133ALegal Reasoning – Principle–Fact
134ALegal Reasoning – Right to Privacy
135BLegal Reasoning – Preventive Detention
136BLegal Reasoning – Environmental Law
137CLegal Reasoning – Right to Dignity
138BLegal Reasoning – Freedom of Speech
139BLegal Reasoning – Article 19(1)(a)
140ALegal Reasoning – Freedom of Speech
141BLegal Reasoning – Basic Structure Doctrine
142CLegal Reasoning – Labor / Associations
143ALegal Reasoning – Right to Property / Due Process
144BLegal Reasoning – Double Jeopardy
145BLegal Reasoning – Freedom of Speech / Censorship
146CLegal Reasoning – RTI Act
147BLegal Reasoning – Entry / Privacy
148BLegal Reasoning – Freedom of Expression / Censorship
149BLegal Reasoning – Right to Privacy
150BLegal Reasoning – Equality / Rule of Law